O
Shaker Heights
← Community
InfrastructureCommunity discussion

Lomond/Lynnfield sewer project

Shaker Heights

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Opposed (1)Concerned (4)

At a glance

Public comments
5
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Jul 27, 2026.

Public comments (5)

ConcernedSheela DasJul 27, 2026

Presented a 559-signature petition on the Lomond/Lynnfield SSO project, questioned notice requirements and contract changes, and asked whether sewers can be improved without destroying trees.

City Council (Regular) - Jul 27, 2026 · 50:18 →
ConcernedAmanda KrakowerJul 27, 2026

Called the sewer site consistently unsafe with open trenches and extensive tree damage; offered her expertise consulting on construction tree mitigation.

City Council (Regular) - Jul 27, 2026 · 1:01:58 →
ConcernedBetsie NorrisJul 27, 2026

Described a miserable year of noise, dust, and unused equipment in her yard, questioned the dewatering plan and water-table knowledge, and asked what happens if dewatering fails again.

City Council (Regular) - Jul 27, 2026 · 1:06:23 →
OpposedBarbara LoweJul 27, 2026

Called the project a fiasco with no plan B, asked the City to seek an EPA extension until the oaks go dormant in late fall, and accused the City of misrepresenting the project to the EPA.

City Council (Regular) - Jul 27, 2026 · 1:10:02 →
ConcernedDavid LoweJul 27, 2026

Said he's resigned to losing the trees but worries about ground stability after dewatering; asked the City to slow down and tell residents what happens next.

City Council (Regular) - Jul 27, 2026 · 1:14:16 →